Why do you people think that the problem with WWE is that its PG? ?

You're exactly right. The PG rating has nothing to do with the quality (or lack thereof) of the product. Before the Attitude Era in the late 90's, WWE was PG but things were MUCH better than they are now. Storylines were alot more compelling; the wrestlers had much more charisma and were encouraged/allowed to develop their character; wrestling wise they were much superior because they had more control over what they were able to do in the ring. I agree that blood, swearing, etc. isn't necessary to make a match/promo better. The early 2000's (particularly 2000-2002) was a very balanced period IMO; If WWE had (more or less) maintained that same pace, things would be alot better than it is today.